Interactive Demo | Start your free trial →
Beaver AI Beaver DEMO

Speaker Insights

Understand participation patterns, communication styles, and influence across your meetings

Top Decision Makers

1. Jordan Lee 27 decisions
2. Alex Morgan 31 decisions

Most Active

1. Alex Morgan meetings
2. Jordan Lee meetings

Best Follow-Through

1. Sara Chen / done
2. Jordan Lee / done
A

Alex Morgan

Facilitator

24

Meetings

28%

Talk %

9/12

Actions Done

31

Decisions

Communication Style

"Direct and structured — keeps meetings focused and time-boxed"

Strengths

Meeting facilitation Decision-driving Cross-team coordination

Areas for Growth

Delegating follow-ups Allowing more open discussion time
Collaboration Score 88%
Influence Score 92%
J

Jordan Lee

Decision Maker

22

Meetings

24%

Talk %

16/18

Actions Done

27

Decisions

Communication Style

"Technical and detail-oriented — provides thorough context"

Strengths

Technical leadership Estimation accuracy Risk identification

Areas for Growth

Summarising for non-technical audiences Brevity in updates
Collaboration Score 82%
Influence Score 87%
S

Sara Chen

Contributor

18

Meetings

19%

Talk %

12/14

Actions Done

14

Decisions

Communication Style

"Thoughtful and quality-focused — raises important concerns proactively"

Strengths

Quality advocacy Cross-functional awareness Proactive flagging

Areas for Growth

Speaking up earlier in discussions Presenting to larger groups
Collaboration Score 91%
Influence Score 72%
P

Priya Sharma

Contributor

12

Meetings

16%

Talk %

10/11

Actions Done

9

Decisions

Communication Style

"Customer-centric — always brings the client perspective"

Strengths

Customer advocacy Deal progression Stakeholder management

Areas for Growth

Technical depth Data-driven argumentation
Collaboration Score 85%
Influence Score 68%
L

Li Wei

Observer

8

Meetings

11%

Talk %

6/7

Actions Done

5

Decisions

Communication Style

"Visual and creative — communicates through mockups and diagrams"

Strengths

Design thinking Visual communication User empathy

Areas for Growth

Verbal participation in meetings Defending design decisions
Collaboration Score 78%
Influence Score 55%